Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Personal Teaching Statement


My first choice for teaching would be middle school geometry teacher. This is mostly covered in 7th grade. My back ground in design and construction lend itself very well to this subject. I think this allows me to make connections between geometry and the real world application fairly easy. I have also worked in business for the past 11 years and can connect some basic business practices to mathematics.

In my free time I enjoy camping, hiking, fishing and being outdoors when the weather is nice. I am not a huge sports fan but baseball is fun to go see. It also can be used for teaching math. When I was in middle school in the 1980s, I took sports statistics as a math class and I learned to keep score at baseball games and football games. This was very fun and although I have forgotten many of the methods this would be a great way to for students to collect data or analyze statistics for probability. I would like to have introductory lessons similar to this for many of my lessons. I feel these would play to students interests and connect the lessons more concretely to real life. 

My graphic design experience makes me fairly fluent on a computer and I prefer the Mac platform. I spend to much of my free time playing video games. Mostly FPS style games although sometimes a good RPG adventure game comes along. I have a dog and two cats and live with 3.5 other people. Both of these interests lend themselves to teaching geometry and algebra. Most students have some sort of interest in games and many are geared solely to preteens. Again you can use them for data collection or simply making connections between computer graphics and the mathematics behind them helps students make connections between what they are learning and possible job avenues for them in the future. It also makes it fun if you assign video game playing as homework in order for students to track points and achievement for use in class. 

Math is not Linear and this prezi illustrates that point brilliantly. I agree that math touches so many facets of our day to day life and is so expansive that to teach it without context is like learning to use a computer without having one to work with (this has been done). Connecting previous knowledge is the obvious part of the equation, but I really appreciated that she talked about making connections to future learning. Understanding how what they learned in grade school builds a foundation for what they will learn in high school as well as use in future occupations. Giving them examples from calculus and algebra that connects to the geometry I am teaching. It gets students to think ahead in life and make connections to the fact that it does get easier and more obvious.

The Jump model of teaching math made a lot of sense to me and I have tried to use something similar when helping students with math work in classes I have volunteered in. Breaking every problem up into smaller problems helps show how working on even the hardest problem can be simplified. I also recently used an iPad app called AlgebraTouch that shows you how to break up algebra problems into different components using simple “one-touch” demonstrations. It makes these problems very easy and is very fun to work with. This video didn’t go into as much detail about the Jump method but I did download one of the free sample worksheets and it looks like it demonstrates this strategy very well.

The flip classroom is a good way to set up any classroom that would normally be lecture centered. It gives students a chance to have access to the teacher when working on real problems. It does let students watch the lectures at their own pace and I would add links from a blog that would allow teacher interaction as well as peer support and interaction. In addition giving students journals for which to make notes on and write questions they could bring to class would help them to bridge between the videos and classwork. These journals could also be used to collect data for use in lessons. For instance video game scores for use in statistics analysis. You could use it in bridged classrooms where multiple levels are being taught at once, letting students watch Kahn Academy to get a second perspective on the lesson would in my opinion be a great idea. It would also be important to advocate and apply for funding for students who could not afford technology in their homes. Setting up some way to check out technology or making sure it is available for mobile application. 

I have often heard that practice makes perfect. I have also heard second hand that if you do anything for 10,000 hours before you become an adult, you will reach genius level in that subject. Both point out that it is possible for every kid to be an all-star if they just put their mind to it and practice. I also like the idea of breaking up the subject, especially math, into chunks and practicing pieces individually, and eventually putting it back together in a whole learning environment. This gives students connection between the small pieces and how they fit into the bigger picture. I hope to use this method in my teaching. I feel that math is like learning a second language and that it needs to be practiced in context to become proficient. 

The best practices in education that stand out for me are Differentiation, Ecology, Problem Development, Clear and Common Focus, High Standards and Supportive Learning in no particular order. Differentiation refers to attacking problems from different points of view and different levels of understanding. Not all students learn at the same rate or have the same learning styles. It is very important to me to offer students different ways to show they their understanding and learn in the way that suits them both. Ecology might be my favorite. I think that taking math or any other material out of the vacuum of the text book and applying it to real-world problems or situations makes better learning.  Making those connections are key to answer that age old question of “why do I need to know this”. It also helps when trying to engage students. Using their interests as learning experiences helps them to internalize the information. Along with this Problem Development gets students to think backwards and reflect on where the instruction can be used. It forces them to make the connections and allows for critical thinking. Having a Clear and Common Focus, from teacher, student, parents, administrator and staff makes sure everyone effected is on the same page. Teachers as well as Students need commitment from parents and administrators because they are the support system that reinforces learning. High Standards ensures that not only is everyone held to the same standard but that each person, teachers included, are working at their best level. Students who are challenged within their Zone of Proximal Development achieve at a higher rate than students who are not. Supportive Learning provides a positive, safe environment for all students to participate and learn.

“Practice can not be separated from theory” in that what we learn must be what we teach. As we as educators teach we must constantly be learning as well. This seemingly simple idea sometimes get lost as we set into our day to day routine. Learning about our students, and their worlds, learning new strategies, learning new ways to connect our lessons to the outside world, these are ways we can continue to develop as educators. Several principles for instruction that I think are important are: Allowing for errors, provide students to learn as they go. Provide for immediate relevance and make it obvious, the connections between your lesson and the your students future. And make Instruction learner centered so that students drive the learning and hopefully demand a high quality education.

I feel that a hybrid classroom that included these aspects in a cohesive learning environment are essential to setting up students for success. A classroom where students come in prepared for class and excited about learning may seem like a difficult task but I think it is achievable. Lessons that immerse the student in the subject and connect him/her to their future, engage them and motivate them to learn what I will be teaching. Lessons that implore interaction gives students the desire to learn mathematics and make it relevant. 

Research and Information Fluency for Teachers


Research and information fluency for me is staying current on curriculum, math context and how they relate to the content you are teaching. Staying up to date on  current trends and new technology in any field is important to stay fluent in your subject. Math changes and it is nothing like what I did when I was in middle school. With the introduction of computers and all the technology, useful math has taken on a more meaningful context for me. Seeing how it is used in video games, computer modeling and design makes it easier for me to point to real examples to my students. Also connecting math through the other disciplines is important. Science lends its self well to integrate math using data, graphing and other elements but successfully integrating it into ELA is more challenging. If you can find ways to do this, not only do you make better connections but you also bring in elements to ELA that more mathematically minded students would identify with.

There are a myriad of resources out there to help you identify knowledge that a teacher would need to be fluent in their subject. Mathematics Curriculum Topic Study, by Page Keeley and Cheryl M. Rose (2006) is a great guide for finding resources for connecting state standards and practices that best suit them. It has over 200 pages that break out each standard and give resources for which you can find lessons and learning material to go along with it. On page 43 there is a "Cycle of Learning" diagram that illustrates different facets of learning. "Topic Application, Topic Engagement, Topic Elicitation, Topic Exploration, Topic Development, Topic Synthesis and Reflection" are all parts of inquiry based instruction that I think help teachers keep understand how to approach and adapt to learning. Connecting the material to the "adult content knowledge" we wish them to know is how we as educators need to approach the material we are teaching. The first component is using staying current with the standards and understanding why they were developed. Then making the connections to our lessons is most important part.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Connected Math Interview



On December 12th I interviewed my mentor teacher from my student teaching about Connected Math and I found it interesting the information she gave me. In general she really likes the curriculum but pointed out, in my opinion, a huge hole in the design. No instruction for the teacher on how to set up the lessons. No notes on how teacher should introduce topics or how to give them a basic understanding of the concepts. Maybe this is because it is trying to be more inquiry based but some resourced would be nice. She did say that the lessons do follow a good logical progression, but that if instructions is not deliberate students get confused. This makes it very important for the teacher to set up the lesson with the understanding about how his/her student learn and thorough knowledge of the subject. Another drawback involves homework. Because this math is so different from what many parents know, it is difficult for them to help with homework. I was thinking that when I teach these lessons it might be a good idea to flip my classroom, assigning videos online for students to watch the night before. There are videos on the connected math webpage that I might be able to use. Using the site as a resource I can help students who fall behind or are more advanced work at their own pace. The class that I will be doing my student teaching in would be perfect for this because they have one laptop of every two students available with internet in the classroom. I intend to take full advantage of this resource when I start teaching in January. This is perfect for the way her classroom is set up, in pairs of tables, so student can naturally work together. This also makes it easy to larger groups of four students by just turning around. 

I look forward to working with connected math but I know it will be challenging to make the connections and introduction of the material in a way that these students will understand. I will also have to be able to summarize and present clear objectives that connect to the unit. 

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Inquiry Learning Model and The CMP Model


The goal of the CMP Model of learning is very similar to the Inquiry Learning Model in that it aims to produce reasoning students. The classical sources of inquiry learning date back to Aristotle but more recently was introduced into modern education by John Dewey with the notion of constructivist education. The CMP model takes a functional approach to teaching mathematics as apposed to a structural approach. This aligns it more with the Inquiry Learning Model and centers it around the student. Rather than focusing on learning the procedures of solving equations it helps students to understand the function of the equations and to "uncover" equations as part of problem solving. This is directly apposed to the direct instruction model of education where the teacher is the primary source of information. Instead using CMP as an inquiry based learning model, students discover and put into contact mathematical principles and thus internalize the importance and properties of what is being studied. The traditional or Glencoe Mathematics system relies heavily on completely modeled examples with clear explanations that are accompanied by guided practice. Although this seems to be a good way to teach, it is the epitome of direct instruction and works very well for only students who thrive in this sort of environment. In order to reach a wider range of student, I feel inquiry based learning supported by a knowledgeable teacher with bits of direct instruction would do a better job of teaching higher order reasoning students. It would also make math more interesting to students who learning styles differ from the teachers teaching style.
Resources:
The Teaching of Equation Solving: Approaches in Standards-Based and Traditional Curricula in the United States, Pedagogies: An International Journal.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Closure and Anticipatory Set

Closure
Closure is the release of students the ability to demonstrate their ability to use the material. It can be the conclusion but also could be further questions that you give the student to think about. Maybe something you want them to think about for the next lesson? It should have obvious clues for students to understand they have successfully completed the lesson. or make account if students need to revisit it. It can also have a component that connects this lesson to previous lessons for the students.

Anticipatory Set
Anticipatory Set is the question you pose to your students to get them interested in the material. It grabs their attention and sets them up for the lesson. It's purpose is to focus the students attention on the subject. One important aspect of the anticipatory set is the outline or objectives you give a student so they have a clear idea of the goals for the lesson. It can make connections to previous learning.


Sources:

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

3-4 Assignment


My micro teaching lesson last semester on using nets to produce cubs and other 3D shapes was taught to 3 other people in my cohort. I started with a short demonstration on how a cardboard box was put together. I thought the visuals worked well and the worksheets worked out ok. One student caught on very well but I had I don't think my instruction helped one of the students. I think a more in-depth group discussion as well as being more explicit with my instructions would have been better. I should have written some of the key elements of a cube net on the board as they where discovered and I think that I could have been clearer with my expectations. I thought that having the majority of the work a hands-on activity was the best part of the lesson and being able to adapt it to several different learning levels also worked well. I also think that the translation from three students to a classroom full of students might be challenging for this lesson but if I worked more on the board and had more description written down I could effectively reach 30 or so students. 

2 of 3 My classroom


  • Preview and reflect on each of the following mini-presentations.


Math is not Linear is my favorite of the three presentations. First I think Prezi is brilliant and second I agree that math touches so many facets of our day to day life and is so expansive that to teach it without context is like learning to use a computer without having one to work with (this has been done). Connecting previous knowledge is the obvious part of the equation, but I really appreciated that she talked about making connections to future learning. I think this is great. It gets students to think ahead in life and make connections to the fact that it does get easier and more obvious. 

The Jump model of teaching math made a lot of sense to me and I have tried to use something similar when helping students with math work in classes I have volunteered in. Breaking every problem up into smaller problems helps show how working on even the hardest problem can be simplified. I also recently used an iPad app called AlgebraTouch that shows you how to break up algebra problems into different components using simple “one-touch” demonstrations. It makes these problems very easy and is very fun to work with. This video didn’t go into as much detail about the Jump method but I did download one of the free sample worksheets and it looks like it demonstrates this strategy very well.

The flip classroom is a good way to set up any classroom that would normally be lecture centered. It gives students a chance to have access to the teacher when working on real problems. It does let students watch the lectures at their own pace but I worry about students who don’t have access to computers or simply don’t do their homework. You would have to lecture to them anyway or set aside time for them to watch the video in class. It also doesn’t give students a chance to ask questions as the lecture goes along. Maybe some sort of hybrid with a teacher available in a forum while students watch the videos at home would be more appropriate. You could use it in bridged classrooms where multiple levels are being taught at once, letting students watch Kahn Academy to get a second perspective on the lesson would in my opinion be a good idea.

The talent code is an interesting statement and I have often heard that practice makes perfect. I have also heard second hand that if you do anything for 10,000 hours before you become an adult, you will reach genius level in that subject. Both point out that it is possible for every kid to be an allstar if they just put their mind to it and practice. I also like the idea of breaking up the subject, especially math, into chunks and practicing pieces individually. I hope to use this method in my teaching.

Together these techniques would help to foster a better learning environment for many students. I will use elements of all of them in my classroom.